Skip to content

Who Killed Jogging?

May 30, 2013

If words did not change more people would actually understand Shakespeare than pretend to. In the Age of Acceleration, things change at the drop of a tense. The iPad I am touching right now juices and crib kills ideas, relationships and movements -and words- at the light thump of a zillion screen-taps.

But there are words that have not gone the way of perchance, spittoon or flapper – they have withered and died not because we have ceased to use or do the things they describe. They are dying or dead because somehow we have collectively emoted the good vibe for how different words convey how we feel about ourselves.

This is not about Correctness, nor is it about the withering of pretense and affect in favor of simple language, this is about linguistic narcissism – we want to use words that pretend we are who we want to be and are actually doing what we wish we were doing.

In making a verbal Fun House mirror that distorts meaning to comport with our best hopes about who we are, some words effectively kill other words:

Jogging has been killed by Running. Back in the depths of the 20th century, I was an athlete.  Athletes would get better by “running” – knees were up, arms pumped, forward body lean, full-on aerobic depletion. Non-athletes “jogged” – knees slightly bent, arms slightly moving, dead vertical posture, heavy breathing, but no distress.

Jogging helped prevent heart attacks without immediately wrecking your knees. You jogged to burn off that banana split. Now everyone “runs” and no one “jogs”. Very fat people, very old people, the very unathletic people (who do it once every few weeks) “run”.

But if you Old School ran as a fat person, you would be a wreck for weeks after, as the stress of your bulk would make tendons and muscles strain to the point of damage. Very annuated folk like me can easily die by Old School running.

But it feels better to say you “ran” 4 miles in an hour. The worst high school track athlete runs 4 miles in 30 minutes…but we now “run” if we move faster than “power walking” (something that seems to have ceased to exist – in spite of the effective hype of Dan Ackroyd in Dr. Detroit.)

Feminism/Feminist has been killed by Equality/Equity. Whether it was “herstory” trying to muscle out “history”, or “womyn” proffered for “women” – or Limbaugh coining ” Feminazi”, the words ” I am not a raging” now seem to always preface the word “feminist”. I did not know a woman in the 1980’s who would not describe herself as a feminist. Now that word is self-parodying.

It’s not fashion or politics, we are made  uncomfortable when words inaccurately render us radicals when all we feel are simple truths. Feminism meant too much, it determined who you were with sweeping generalizations – but equal pay for equal work, equal opportunity, gender equality are unarguably clear (and limited) in their values.  Having said that, “Ms.” is a very convenient compensation for marriage-status ignorance.

Efficient has been killed by Sustainable. Whereas “jogging” and “feminist” were trendy temp’s in the word world, replaced by words that they replaced, “Efficient”  is the essence of the Green Movement without the morality. To be efficient used to be morally unambiguous. Spending less was a good thing. But now it’s not enough to be efficient – expending less is inadequate when you can expend less and do good – and be sustainable.

Now doing the right thing, even if it has to cost more, is what we aspire to – or at least we are told we should aspire to. But the 6 year economic discomfort we have all experienced may once again make spending less more important than being sustainable.

Contemporary has been killed by Modern.  It used to be hip for non-architects to feel on the crest of cultural cool – to be contemporary – in homes it meant anti-history, anti-ornament, anti-color scheme – it was white, light and space.

But it is now inadequate to be contemporary, it is too limited to be at the edge of expectation, we seem to want to be at the tugging edge of cool, to be Modern. A Modern house has a wow factor that is simply not hype-able by the description “Contemporary.” And “Contemporary” as a house style is now pure Brady Bunch.

More and more real estate agents run away from the “C” word as it means leaks, rot, glare and cracks – Modern houses are too newly built to suffer the adolescent traumas of a flat-roofed, trimless and plate glass upbringing.

Words reflect reality, or we are babbling. But reality is not static – we are aspirational, we want to be better. The words we use can force others to recognize that we “get it”. We can all be athletic if we “run”, on moral high ground if we proclaim “equality” as a value, be smart when we live “sustainably” and cool if we are “modern”.

But since we write our own language it does not reform us, it merely reflects who we are, or want to be. The gap between reality and desire is what makes progress part of our genetic, hard-wired reality – but the words we use are not a self-help program.

Words do not create the state we desire – you can be out of shape, despite “running”, morally evolving even when favoring “equality”‘, an SUV is never as “sustainable” as a compact car, and “Modern” is a style, not a lifestyle…

Words matter, but they are, in the end, just words.

8 Comments leave one →
  1. May 31, 2013 7:28 am

    As a wordsmith and someone who considers herself fortunate enough to be able to make a living out of loving language, tinkering with tense, and waxing poetic with words, I thoroughly enjoyed this requiem to some of the lexicon no longer with us.

    It’s been much the same in my world (the career-management side of my practice), where terms such as paperless office (remember that unattainable goal from the 80s?!), multi-tasker, worldwide web, big-picture thinker, and information superhighway scream obsolescence. Or where a resume that includes a pager number, the dreaded objective that’s all about you (“I seek a challenging opportunity where I can advance, learn new skills, and blah-blah-blah”), the totally unnecessary space-waster “References available upon request,” and a phone number modified with the word “cell” and doesn’t include an email and LinkedIn address is hopelessly outdated.

    Indeed, my SUV sits in my modern garage: I’m off for a run before it gets any hotter…

  2. Binnie Klein permalink
    June 1, 2013 7:54 am

    This is good — I particularly like the section about “whatever happened to the words feminist and feminism”….so true….Language is a contract. We get together and agree to call a pen “a pen” – and then the contract starts changing…..

  3. Allan permalink
    June 1, 2013 8:53 am

    Hi Duo,

    Enjoyed your article and another architect word I seem to be using more and more is “context” describing architectural designs and the lack of it…… ie. it doesn’t matter, it’s not there, anything goes. Look forward to talking with you about that. Oh well…….Thanks for sending the article.


  4. martha rendeiro permalink
    June 1, 2013 9:47 pm

    Hi Duo,
    I really appreciate your column. Here’s one of my favorite Confucius quotes:
    “If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything.”


  1. Welcome to Saved by Design! | Saved By Design
  2. Page not found | Saved By Design
  3. Welcome to Saved by Design! | Saved By Design

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: